Kodak 2000 Annual Report Download - page 41

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 41 of the 2000 Kodak annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 110

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110

stantially offset by gains from the revaluation or settlement of the
underlying positions hedged.
The Company has entered into silver forw a rd contracts that
a re designated as cash flow hedges of price risk related to fore-
casted worldwide silver purchas es. The Company used silver for-
w a rd contracts to minimize virtually all of its exposure to incre a s e s
in silver prices in 2000. At December 31, 2000, the Company had
open forw a rd contracts, with maturity dates ranging from January
2001 to December 2001, hedging virtually all of its planned silver
re q u i rements through the fourth quarter of 2001.
At December 31, 2000, the fair value of open contracts was
a pre-tax unrealized loss of $17 million, re c o rded in other com-
p rehensive income. If this amount were to be realized, $16 mil-
lion (pre-tax) of this loss would be reclassified into cost of goods
sold within the next twelve months. During the year, a realized loss
of $3 million (pre-tax) was re c o rded in cost of goods sold. At
December 31, 2000, realized losses of $4 million (pre - t a x ) ,
related to closed silver contracts, were re c o rded in other com-
p rehensive income. These losses will be reclassified into cost of
goods sold as silver-containing products are s old (all within the
next twelve months). Hedge ineffectiveness was insignificant.
A sensitivity analysis indicates that, based on bro k e r- q u o t e d
t e rmination values, if the price of silver decreased 10% from spot
rates at December 31, 2000 and 1999, the fair value of silver for-
w a rd contracts would be reduced by $27 million and $5 million,
re s p e c t i v e l y. Such losses in fair value, if realized, would be off s e t
by lower costs of manufacturing silver-containing pro d u c t s .
The C ompany is exposed to interest rate ris k primarily
t h rough its borrowing activities and, to a lesser extent, thro u g h
investments in marketable securities. The Company utilizes U.S.
dollar denominated as well as foreign currency denominated
b o rrowings to fund its working capital and investment needs. The
majority of short - t e rm and long-term borrowings are in fixed
rate instruments. There is inherent roll-over risk for borro w i n g s
and marketable s ecurities as they mature and are renewed at
c u rrent market rates. The extent of this risk is not pre d i c t a b l e
because of the variability of future interest rates and business
financing re q u i re m e n t s .
Using a yield-to-maturity analysis, if December 31, 2000
i n t e rest rates increased 10% (about 62 basis points) with the
c u rrent periods level of debt, the fair value of short - t e rm and long-
t e rm borrowings would decrease $2 million and $20 million,
re s p e c t i v e l y. If December 31, 1999 interest rates increased 10%
(about 55 basis points) with the December 31, 1999 level of debt,
the fair value of short - t e rm and long-term borrowings would
d e c reas e $1 million and $18 million, re s p e c t i v e l y.
The Company’s financial instrument counterparties are high
quality investment or commercial banks with significant experi-
ence with such instruments . The Company manages exposure
to counterparty credit risk by requiring specific minimum cre d i t
s t a n d a rds and diversification of counterparties. The Company has
p ro c e d u res to monitor the credit exposure amounts. The maxi-
mum credit exposure at December 31, 2000 was not significant
to the Company.
40