American Airlines 2005 Annual Report Download - page 68

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 68 of the 2005 American Airlines annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 108

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108

65
7. Financial Instruments and Risk Management
As part of the Company's risk management program, AMR uses a variety of financial instruments, primarily fuel
option and collar contracts. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading
purposes.
The Company is exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to these financial
instruments, but it does not expect any of the counterparties to fail to meet its obligations. The credit exposure
related to these financial instruments is represented by the fair value of contracts with a positive fair value at the
reporting date, reduced by the effects of master netting agreements. To manage credit risks, the Company
selects counterparties based on credit ratings, limits its exposure to a single counterparty under defined
guidelines, and monitors the market position of the program and its relative market position with each
counterparty. The Company also maintains industry-standard security agreements with a number of its
counterparties which may require the Company or the counterparty to post collateral if the value of selected
instruments exceed specified mark-to-market thresholds or upon certain changes in credit ratings. The
Company’s outstanding posted collateral as of December 31, 2005 is included in restricted cash and short-term
investments and is not material. A deterioration of the Company’s liquidity position may negatively affect the
Company’s ability to hedge fuel in the future.
Fuel Price Risk Management
American enters into jet fuel, heating oil and crude oil hedging contracts to dampen the impact of the volatility in
jet fuel prices. These instruments generally have maturities of up to 24 months. The Company accounts for its
fuel derivative contracts as cash flow hedges and records the fair value of its fuel hedging contracts in Other
current assets and Accumulated other comprehensive loss on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The Company determines the ineffective portion of its fuel hedge contracts by comparing the cumulative change
in the total value of the fuel hedge contract, or group of fuel hedge contracts, to the cumulative change in a
hypothetical jet fuel hedge. If the total cumulative change in value of the fuel hedge contract more than offsets
the total cumulative change in a hypothetical jet fuel hedge, the difference is considered ineffective and is
immediately recognized as a component of Aircraft fuel expense. Effective gains or losses on fuel hedging
contracts are deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive loss and are recognized in earnings as a component
of Aircraft fuel expense when the underlying jet fuel being hedged is used.
Ineffectiveness is inherent in hedging jet fuel with derivative positions based in crude oil or other crude oil related
commodities. As required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities”, the Company assesses, both at the inception of each hedge and on an on-
going basis, whether the derivatives that are used in its hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting
changes in cash flows of the hedged items. In doing so, the Company uses a regression model to determine the
correlation of the change in prices of the commodities used to hedge jet fuel (e.g. WTI Crude oil and NYMEX
Heating oil) to the change in the price of jet fuel over a 36 month period. The Company also monitors the actual
dollar offset of the hedges’ market values as compared to hypothetical jet fuel hedges. The fuel hedge contracts
are generally deemed to be “highly effective” if the R-squared is greater than 80 percent and the dollar offset
correlation is within 80 percent to 125 percent. The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively if it
determines that a derivative is no longer expected to be highly effective as a hedge or if it decides to discontinue
the hedging relationship. As a result of its quarterly effectiveness assessment on September 30, 2005, the
Company determined that all of its derivatives settling during the remainder of 2005 and certain of its derivatives
settling in 2006 were no longer expected to be highly effective in offsetting changes in forecasted jet fuel
purchases. As a result, effective on October 1, 2005, all subsequent changes in the fair value of those particular
hedge contracts have been and will be recognized directly in earnings rather than being deferred in Accumulated
other comprehensive loss. Hedge accounting will continue to be applied to derivatives used to hedge forecasted
jet fuel purchases that are expected to remain highly effective.