Symantec 2000 Annual Report Download - page 26

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 26 of the 2000 Symantec annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 59

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59

We assumed that revenue attributable to L-3s in-process tech-
nology would be approximately $1million in the first year and
increase in the second and third years of the six-year projection
period at annual rates of 543%and 82%, respectively, and then
decrease at rates of 3%, 20%and 45%, over the remaining three
years. We projected annual revenues to range from approximately
$1million to $13 million over the projected period. These projec-
tions were based on:
aggregate growth rates for the business as a whole;
individual product revenues;
anticipated product development cycles; and
the life of the underlying technology.
We estimated selling, general and administrative expenses for the
in-process technology to be 221%of revenue in the first year,
reducing to 45%in each of the remaining five years of the six-year
projection period.
We projected operating results before acquisition related amor-
tization charges to range from a $2million loss during the first
year to a $3million profit during the third year. The operating prof-
its would then decrease 3%in the fourth year to 45%by the sixth
year, resulting in profits of approximately $3million, $3million
and $1million, respectively. Because we assumed that most prod-
uct development costs would be incurred in the first year, thereby
reducing operating expenses as a percentage of revenue in later
years, we anticipate that operating profit will increase faster than
revenue in the early years.
We estimated costs to be incurred to reach technological feasi-
bility of the in-process technologies from L-3as of the date of the
acquisition to total approximately $0.3million. We estimated the
in-process technology to be between 68%to 77%complete at that
time. In addition, we began building an intrusion detection product
leveraging L-3s core technology, which we plan to release in the
second half of fiscal 2001.
We used a discount rate of 25%for valuing the in-process tech-
nologies from L-3, which we believe reflects the risk associated
with the completion of these research and development projects
and the estimated future economic benefits to be generated sub-
sequent to their completion. This discount rate is higher than the
weighted average cost of capital of 20%, due to the fact that the
technology had not reached technological feasibility as of the date
of the valuation.
The assumptions and projections discussed for the technologies
acquired from L-3were based on information available at the time
and should not be taken as indications of actual results, which
could vary materially based on the risks and uncertainties iden-
tified in the risk factors set forth in our previously filed Form 10K
for the year ended March 31, 2000.
URLabs This discussion contains forward-looking statements of
certain aspects of our future operating results from URLabs.
Actual results may differ from the estimates expressly or implic-
itly referred to by these forward-looking statements.
The in-process technology acquired in the URLabs acquisition pri-
marily consisted of research and development related to the next
generation of URLabstwo main products, I-Gear 3.5and Mail
Gear 1.2. The I-Gear and Mail Gear product lines are designed for
content management use in URL filtering and e-mail filtering,
respectively. URLabs’ research and development was focused on
providing more robust features in its development of the next gen-
eration products of I-Gear 3.5and Mail Gear 1.2.
We assumed that revenue attributable to URLabs’ in-process technol-
ogy would be approximately $4 million in the first year and increase
in the second and third years of the five-year projection period at
annual rates of 77% and 40%, respectively, and then decrease at rates
of 2% and 38% over the remaining two years. We projected annual rev-
enues to range from approximately $4 million to $11 million over the
projected period. These projections were based on:
aggregate growth rates for the business as a whole;
individual product revenues;
anticipated product development cycles; and
the life of the underlying technology.
We estimated selling, general and administrative expenses for the
in-process technology to be approximately 69%of revenue in the
first year, reducing to approximately 50%in each of the remain-
ing four years of the five-year projection period.
We projected operating profit before acquisition related amorti-
zation charges to increase from less than $1million during the
first year to approximately $2.5million during the third year. We
projected that operating profits would then decrease from 7%to
35%during the remaining two years, resulting in profits of approx-
imately $2.4million and $1.5million, respectively. Because we
assumed that most product development costs would be incurred
in the first year, reducing operating expenses as a percentage of
revenue in later years, we anticipate operating profit to increase
faster than revenue in the early years.
We estimated costs to be incurred to reach technological feasi-
bility of the in-process technologies from URLabs as of the date of
the acquisition to total approximately $0.2million. We estimated
the in-process technology to be between 30%to 40%complete at
that time. We projected the introduction of acquired in-process
26 }0