American Express 2002 Annual Report Download - page 65

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 65 of the 2002 American Express annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 92

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92

I63 AXP INOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, (FIN 45) which
provides accounting and disclosure requirements for certain guarantees. The accounting provisions of FIN 45, which are
effective for certain guarantees issued or modified beginning January 1, 2003, will impact the company based upon the fair
value amount of guarantees that are issued or modified beginning at that time. The company is still evaluating the impact of
adopting FIN 45 on the Consolidated Financial Statements; the disclosure requirements of FIN 45 are addressed in Note 11 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (FIN 46), which addresses
consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities (VIEs). The accounting provisions and expanded disclosure
requirements for VIEs existing at December 31, 2002, are fully effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2003.
An entity shall be subject to consolidation according to the provisions of FIN 46, if, by design, either (i) the total equity invest-
ment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from
other parties, or, (ii) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack: (a) direct or indirect ability to make decisions
about an entity’s activities; (b) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity if they occur; or (c) the right to receive
the expected residual return of the entity if they occur. In general, FIN 46 will require a VIE to be consolidated when an enter-
prise has a variable interest that will absorb a majority of the VIE’s expected losses or receive a majority of the VIE’s expected
residual return.
It is likely that the company will either consolidate or disclose additional information about VIEs when FIN 46 becomes fully
effective in the third quarter of 2003. The entities primarily impacted by FIN 46 relate to structured investments, including
CDOs and secured loan trusts (SLTs), which are both managed and partially owned by the company’s AEFA operating seg-
ment. The application of FIN 46 for CDOs and SLTs will have no effect on the cash flows of the company. The CDO entities
contain debt issued to investors, which are non-recourse to the company and are solely supported by portfolios of high-yield
bonds and loans. AEFA manages the portfolios of high-yield bonds and loans with a fair value at December 31, 2002 of
approximately $3.0 billion for the benefit of the $3.7 billion in CDO debt investors and often retains an interest in the residual
and rated debt tranches of the CDO structures. The company’s interest in the rated debt tranches along with rated tranches of
non-managed CDOs were placed in a securitization trust described in Note 2. The SLTs provide returns to investors primarily
based on the performance of an underlying portfolio of $3.4 billion in high-yield loans with a market value at December 31,
2002 of $3.1 billion, which are generally managed by the company.
While the potential consolidation of these entities may impact the results of operations at adoption and for each reporting
period thereafter, the company’s maximum exposure to economic loss as a result of its investment in these entities is repre-
sented by the carrying values at December 31, 2002 because any further reduction in the value of the assets will be absorbed
by third-party investors. The CDO residual tranches have an adjusted cost basis of $28 million and the SLTs have an adjusted
cost basis of $684 million.
The company continues to evaluate other relationships and interests in entities that may be considered VIEs, including afford-
able housing investments. The impact of adopting FIN 46 on the Consolidated Financial Statements is still being reviewed.
Note 2 INVESTMENTS
The following is a summary of investments at December 31:
(Millions) 2002 2001
Available-for-Sale, at fair value $ 49,102 $ 42,225
Investment loans (fair value: 2002, $4,405; 2001, $4,195) 3,981 4,024
Trading 555 239
Total $ 53,638 $ 46,488