eBay 2004 Annual Report Download - page 18

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 18 of the 2004 eBay annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 134

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134

In July 2004, a purported class action lawsuit was Ñled by two eBay users in Superior Court of the State
of California, County of Santa Clara (No. 104CV022708) alleging that eBay engaged in improper billing
practices as the result of problems with the rollout of a new billing software system in the second and third
quarters of 2004. The lawsuit sought damages and injunctive relief. An amended complaint was Ñled in
January 2005, dropping one plaintiÅ, changing the capacity of the other plaintiÅ to that of representative
plaintiÅ, and adding seven additional eBay users as plaintiÅs. The amended complaint expanded its claim to
include numerous alleged improper billing practices from September 2003 until the present. In February 2005,
eBay Ñled a motion to strike and a demurrer seeking to dismiss the complaint. We believe that we have
meritorious defenses and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.
In February 2005, eBay was sued in Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara
(No. 105CV035930) in a purported class action alleging that certain bidding features of our site constitute
""shill bidding'' for the purpose of artiÑcially inÖating bids placed by buyers on the site. The complaint alleges
violations of California's Auction Act, California's Consumer Remedies Act, and unfair competition. The
complaint seeks injunctive relief, damages, and a constructive trust. The plaintiÅs have not yet served eBay
with the complaint. We believe that we have meritorious defenses and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.
Other third parties have from time to time claimed, and others may claim in the future, that we have
infringed their intellectual property rights. We have been notiÑed of several potential patent disputes, and
expect that we will increasingly be subject to patent infringement claims as our services expand in scope and
complexity. In particular, we expect to face additional patent infringement claims involving services we
provide, including various aspects of our Payments business. We have in the past been forced to litigate such
claims. We may also become more vulnerable to third-party claims as laws such as the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act, the Lanham Act and the Communications Decency Act are interpreted by the courts and as
we expand geographically into jurisdictions where the underlying laws with respect to the potential liability of
online intermediaries like ourselves are either unclear or less favorable. These claims, whether meritorious or
not, could be time consuming and costly to resolve, cause service upgrade delays, require expensive changes in
our methods of doing business, or could require us to enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements.
From time to time, we are involved in other disputes that arise in the ordinary course of business. The
number and signiÑcance of these disputes is increasing as our business expands and our company grows larger.
Any claims against us, whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, require
signiÑcant amounts of management time, and result in the diversion of signiÑcant operational resources.
ITEM 4: SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no submissions of matters to a vote of security holders during the quarter ended
December 31, 2004.
16