Kodak 2004 Annual Report Download - page 40
Download and view the complete annual report
Please find page 40 of the 2004 Kodak annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.Financials
38
E A S T M A N K OD A K C O M PA N Y
toringcostsof$35million.AtDecember31,2004,thesecostsareaccrued
andincludedinthe$153millionreportedinotherlong-termliabilities.
TheCompanyhasretainedcertainobligationsforenvironmental
remediationandSuperfundmattersrelatedtocertainsitesassociated
withthenon-imaginghealthbusinessessoldin1994.AtDecember31,
2004,estimatedfutureremediationcostsof$30millionareaccruedfor
thesesitesandareincludedinthe$153millionreportedinotherlong-term
liabilities.
Cashexpendituresfortheaforementionedinvestigation,remediation
andmonitoringactivitiesareexpectedtobeincurredoverthenextthirty
yearsformanyofthesites.Fortheseknownenvironmentalexposures,the
accrualreflectstheCompany’sbestestimateoftheamountitwillincur
undertheagreed-uponorproposedworkplans.TheCompany’scostes-
timatesweredeterminedusingtheASTMStandardE2137-01,“Standard
GuideforEstimatingMonetaryCostsandLiabilitiesforEnvironmentalMat-
ters,”andhavenotbeenreducedbypossiblerecoveriesfromthirdparties.
Theoverallmethodincludestheuseofaprobabilisticmodelwhichfore-
castsarangeofcostestimatesfortheremediationrequiredatindividual
sites.Theprojectsarecloselymonitoredandthemodelsarereviewedas
significanteventsoccuroratleastonceperyear.TheCompany’sestimate
includesequipmentandoperatingcostsforremediationandlong-term
monitoringofthesites.TheCompanydoesnotbelieveitisreasonably
possiblethatthelossesfortheknownexposurescouldexceedthecurrent
accrualsbymaterialamounts.
AConsentDecreewassignedin1994insettlementofacivil
complaintbroughtbytheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyandthe
U.S.DepartmentofJustice.InconnectionwiththeConsentDecree,the
CompanyissubjecttoaComplianceSchedule,underwhichtheCompany
hasimproveditswastecharacterizationprocedures,upgradedoneofits
incinerators,andisevaluatingandupgradingitsindustrialsewersystem.
Thetotalexpendituresrequiredtocompletethisprogramarecurrently
estimatedtobeapproximately$15millionoverthenextfiveyears.These
expendituresareincurredaspartofplantoperationsand,therefore,arenot
includedintheenvironmentalaccrualatDecember31,2004.
TheCompanyispresentlydesignatedasapotentiallyresponsible
party(PRP)undertheComprehensiveEnvironmentalResponse,Compensa-
tion,andLiabilityActof1980,asamended(theSuperfundLaw),orunder
similarstatelaws,forenvironmentalassessmentandcleanupcostsasthe
resultoftheCompany’sallegedarrangementsfordisposalofhazardous
substancesatfivesuchactivesites.Withrespecttoeachofthesesites,the
Company’sliabilityisminimal.Inaddition,theCompanyhasbeenidentified
asaPRPinconnectionwiththenon-imaginghealthbusinessesinfour
activeSuperfundsites.NumerousotherPRPshavealsobeendesignated
atthesesites.AlthoughthelawimposesjointandseveralliabilityonPRPs,
theCompany’shistoricalexperiencedemonstratesthatthesecostsare
sharedwithotherPRPs.SettlementsandcostspaidbytheCompanyin
Superfundmatterstodatehavenotbeenmaterial.Futurecostsarealso
notexpectedtobematerialtotheCompany’sfinancialposition,resultsof
operationsorcashflows.
TheCleanAirActAmendmentswereenactedin1990.Expenditures
tocomplywiththeCleanAirActimplementingregulationsissuedtodate
havenotbeenmaterialandhavebeenprimarilycapitalinnature.Inaddi-
tion,futureexpendituresforexistingregulations,whichareprimarilycapital
innature,arenotexpectedtobematerial.Manyoftheregulationstobe
promulgatedpursuanttothisActhavenotbeenissued.
Uncertaintiesassociatedwithenvironmentalremediationcontingen-
ciesarepervasiveandoftenresultinwiderangesofoutcomes.Estimates
developedintheearlystagesofremediationcanvarysignificantly.Afinite
estimateofcostdoesnotnormallybecomefixedanddeterminableata
specifictime.Rather,thecostsassociatedwithenvironmentalremediation
becomeestimableoveracontinuumofeventsandactivitiesthathelpto
frameanddefinealiability,andtheCompanycontinuallyupdatesitscost
estimates.TheCompanyhasanongoingmonitoringandidentification
processtoassesshowtheactivities,withrespecttotheknownexposures,
areprogressingagainsttheaccruedcostestimates,aswellastoidentify
otherpotentialremediationsitesthatarepresentlyunknown.
Estimatesoftheamountandtimingoffuturecostsofenvironmen-
talremediationrequirementsarenecessarilyimprecisebecauseofthe
continuingevolutionofenvironmentallawsandregulatoryrequirements,
theavailabilityandapplicationoftechnology,theidentificationofpresently
unknownremediationsitesandtheallocationofcostsamongthepoten-
tiallyresponsibleparties.Baseduponinformationpresentlyavailable,such
futurecostsarenotexpectedtohaveamaterialeffectontheCompany’s
competitiveorfinancialposition.However,suchcostscouldbematerialto
resultsofoperationsinaparticularfuturequarteroryear.
NEWACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS
InDecember2004,theFASBissuedStatementNo.123R,“Share-Based
Payment”(SFASNo.123R),arevisiontoSFASNo.123,“Accountingfor
Stock-BasedCompensation”(SFASNo.123).SFASNo.123Reliminates
thealternativetousetheAccountingPrinciplesBoardOpinion25’s(Opinion
25)intrinsicvaluemethodofaccountingthatwasprovidedinSFASNo.123
asoriginallyissued.
UnderOpinion25,issuingstockoptionstoemployeesgenerally
resultedinrecognitionofnocompensationcost.SFASNo.123Rrequires
companiestomeasurethecostofemployeeservicesreceivedinexchange
foranawardofequityinstrumentsbasedonthegrant-datefairvalueofthe
award(withlimitedexceptions).Thatcostwillberecognizedoverthepe-
riodduringwhichanemployeeisrequiredtoprovideservice,inexchange
fortheaward—therequisiteserviceperiod(usuallythevestingperiod).No
compensationcostisrecognizedforequityinstrumentsforwhichemploy-
eesdonotrendertherequisiteservice.
Companieswillinitiallymeasurethecostofemployeeservices
receivedinexchangeforanawardofinstrumentsclassifiedasliabilities
(Leadershipstock,StockAppreciationRights(SARs))basedonitscurrent
fairvalue;thefairvalueoftheawardsclassifiedasaliabilitywillberemea-
suredsubsequentlyateachreportingdatethroughthesettlementdate.
Changesinfairvalueduringtherequisiteserviceperiodwillberecognized
ascompensationcostoverthatperiod.
Thegrant-datefairvalueofemployeeshareoptions,ortheCompany’s
restrictedstockandsimilarinstrumentsclassifiedintheStatementof
FinancialPositionasequitywillbeestimatedusingoption-pricingmodels
adjustedfortheuniquecharacteristicsofthoseinstruments(unlessobserv-
ablemarketpricesforthesameorsimilarinstrumentsareavailable);the
fairvalueofawardsclassifiedasequitywillnotberemeasured.Ifanequity