American Airlines 2007 Annual Report Download - page 25

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 25 of the 2007 American Airlines annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 107

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107

22
On February 14, 2006, the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) served the
Company with a grand jury subpoena as part of an ongoing investigation into possible criminal violations of the
antitrust laws by certain domestic and foreign air cargo carriers. At this time, the Company does not believe it is a
target of the DOJ investigation. The New Zealand Commerce Commission notified the Company on February 17,
2006 that it is also investigating whether the Company and certain other cargo carriers entered into agreements
relating to fuel surcharges, security surcharges, war risk surcharges, and customs clearance surcharges. On
February 22, 2006, the Company received a letter from the Swiss Competition Commission informing the
Company that it too is investigating whether the Company and certain other cargo carriers entered into
agreements relating to fuel surcharges, security surcharges, war risk surcharges, and customs clearance
surcharges. On December 19, 2006 and June 12, 2007, the Company received requests for information from the
European Commission, seeking information regarding the Company's corporate structure, revenue and pricing
announcements for air cargo shipments to and from the European Union. On January 23, 2007, the Brazilian
competition authorities, as part of an ongoing investigation, conducted an unannounced search of the Company’s
cargo facilities in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The authorities are investigating whether the Company and certain other
foreign and domestic air carriers violated Brazilian competition laws by illegally conspiring to set fuel surcharges
on cargo shipments. On June 27, 2007 and October 31, 2007, the Company received requests for information
from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission seeking information regarding fuel surcharges
imposed by the Company on cargo shipments to and from Australia and regarding the structure of the Company's
cargo operations. On December 18, 2007, the European Commission issued a Statement of Objection (“SO”)
against 26 airlines, including the Company. The SO alleges that these carriers participated in a conspiracy to set
surcharges on cargo shipments in violation of EU law. The SO states that, in the event that the allegations in the
SO are affirmed, the Commission will impose fines against the Company. The Company intends to vigorously
contest the allegations and findings in the SO under EU laws, and it intends to cooperate fully with all other
pending investigations. In the event that the SO is affirmed or other investigations uncover violations of the U.S.
antitrust laws or the competition laws of some other jurisdiction, such findings and related legal proceedings could
have a material adverse impact on the Company.
Approximately 44 purported class action lawsuits have been filed in the U.S. against the Company and certain
foreign and domestic air carriers alleging that the defendants violated U.S. antitrust laws by illegally conspiring to
set prices and surcharges on cargo shipments. These cases, along with other purported class action lawsuits in
which the Company was not named, were consolidated in the United States District Court for the Eastern District
of New York as In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation, 06-MD-1775 on June 20, 2006. Plaintiffs
are seeking trebled money damages and injunctive relief. The Company has not been named as a defendant in
the consolidated complaint filed by the plaintiffs. However, the plaintiffs have not released any claims that they
may have against the Company, and the Company may later be added as a defendant in the litigation. If the
Company is sued on these claims, it will vigorously defend the suit, but any adverse judgment could have a
material adverse impact on the Company. Also, on January 23, 2007, the Company was served with a purported
class action complaint filed against the Company, American, and certain foreign and domestic air carriers in the
Supreme Court of British Columbia in Canada (McKay v. Ace Aviation Holdings, et al.). The plaintiff alleges that
the defendants violated Canadian competition laws by illegally conspiring to set prices and surcharges on cargo
shipments. The complaint seeks compensatory and punitive damages under Canadian law. On June 22, 2007,
the plaintiffs agreed to dismiss their claims against the Company. The dismissal is without prejudice and the
Company could be brought back into the litigation at a future date. If litigation is recommenced against the
Company in the Canadian courts, the Company will vigorously defend itself; however, any adverse judgment
could have a material adverse impact on the Company.