Electronic Arts 2011 Annual Report Download - page 48

FISCAL 2011 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table shows information concerning the compensation earned during fiscal 2011 by our Chief
Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our next three most highly compensated executive officers.
For purposes of the compensation tables that follow, we refer to these individuals collectively as the “Named
Executive Officers” or “NEOs.”
Name and Principal Position
Fiscal
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
Option
Awards
($)(3)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(4)
All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
Total
($)
JOHN S. RICCITIELLO ........ 2011 800,000 — 3,508,000 — 1,600,000 2,501 5,910,501
Chief Executive Officer 2010 800,000 — 7,294,950 1,002,287 746,667 1,308 9,845,212
2009 793,749 — 3,306,633(2)(6) — 400,000 1,308 4,501,690
ERIC F. BROWN .............. 2011 600,000 — 1,776,000 — 700,000 4,070 3,080,070
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
2010 600,000 — 2,201,680 — 315,000 4,005 3,120,685
2009 577,731 100,000 5,986,583(2)(7) 4,863,045 200,000 481,459 12,208,818
FRANK D. GIBEAU ........... 2011 591,538 — 2,308,800 — 1,180,000 12,321 4,092,659
President, EA Games 2010 545,000 — 2,657,200 — 423,000 10,919 3,636,119
2009 538,917 — 2,654,884(2)(8) 1,252,640 200,000 8,208 4,654,649
PETER MOORE .............. 2011 594,615 — 2,308,800 — 580,000 12,321 3,495,736
President, EA SPORTS 2010 565,000 — 2,657,200 — 401,000 10,919 3,634,119
2009 564,624 — 2,654,884(2)(9) 782,900 200,000 493,611 4,696,019
JOHN C. SCHAPPERT(10) ....... 2011 600,000 — 2,308,800 — — 15,717 2,924,517
former Chief Operating Officer 2010 424,615 1,000,000(11) 2,502,500(2)(12) 4,106,950 270,000 1,978,556 10,282,621
(1) Represents the aggregate grant-date fair value of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and Performance-Based RSUs granted in
those years. The amounts shown for fiscal 2009 represent the aggregate fair values of the awards as of their grant date and,
therefore, differ from the amounts reported in the fiscal 2009 proxy statement. Grant-date fair value is determined for
financial statement reporting purposes and the amounts shown do not reflect the actual value that will be realized
by the recipient. For RSUs, grant-date fair value is calculated using the closing price of our common stock on the grant
date. Refer to footnote 2 below for a discussion of the fair value calculation for Performance-Based RSUs. For additional
information regarding the valuation methodology for RSUs, see Note 13, “Stock-Based Compensation and Employee
Benefit Plans”, of the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2011. For additional information regarding the specific terms of RSUs granted to NEOs in fiscal 2011, see the
“Fiscal 2011 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” below.
(2) Includes the aggregate grant-date fair value of Performance-Based RSUs granted in those years. Grant-date fair value is
determined for financial statement reporting purposes and the amounts shown do not reflect the actual value that
will be realized by the recipient. For Performance-Based RSUs, the grant-date fair value is the target payout on the grant
date based on the probable outcome of the performance condition. The Performance-Based RSUs do not qualify as
“performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m). For additional information regarding the terms
of Performance-Based RSUs granted to NEOs, see discussion of “Prior Performance-based RSU Program” in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. For additional information on the valuation methodology for Performance-
Based RSUs, see Note 13, “Stock-Based Compensation and Employee Benefit Plans”, of the Consolidated Financial
Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011.
(3) Represents the grant-date fair value of stock options granted in those years. The amounts shown for fiscal 2009 represent
the aggregate fair values of the awards as of their grant date and, therefore, differ from the amounts reported in the fiscal
2009 proxy statement. Grant-date fair value is determined for financial statement reporting purposes and the
amounts shown do not reflect the actual value that will be realized by the recipient. For additional information on the
valuation methodology and assumptions used to calculate the fair value of stock options, see Note 13, “Stock-Based
Compensation and Employee Benefit Plans”, of the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011.
(4) Represents amounts awarded under the Electronic Arts Executive Bonus Plan for fiscal 2011. For additional information
about the bonuses paid to our NEOs in fiscal 2011, see “Executive Bonus Plan” in the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis above. In fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, the minimum funding targets for the Executive Bonus Plan were not met
and our NEOs were awarded discretionary bonuses calculated according to the terms of the EA Bonus Plan.
40