Regions Bank 2010 Annual Report Download - page 140

recorded related to employment agreements with certain individuals of acquired entities. Core deposit intangibles
and most other identifiable intangibles are amortized on an accelerated basis over their expected useful lives.
The Company’s goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events or
circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. Regions assesses the following indicators of goodwill
impairment for each reporting period:
• Recent operating performance,
• Changes in market capitalization,
• Regulatory actions and assessments,
• Changes in the business climate (including legislation, legal factors and competition),
• Company-specific factors (including changes in key personnel, asset impairments, and business
dispositions), and
• Trends in the banking industry.
Adverse changes in the economic environment, declining operations, or other factors could result in a
decline in the implied fair value of goodwill. A goodwill impairment test includes two steps. Step One, used to
identify potential impairment, compares the estimated fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount,
including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the
reporting unit is considered not impaired. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair
value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if
any. Step Two of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied estimated fair value of reporting unit
goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of goodwill for that reporting unit
exceeds the implied fair value of that unit’s goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that
excess.
For purposes of performing Step One of the goodwill impairment test, Regions uses both the income and
market approaches to value its reporting units. Regions uses the output from these approaches to determine
estimated fair value of the reporting unit. The income approach, which is the primary valuation approach,
consists of discounting projected long-term future cash flows, which are derived from internal forecasts and
economic expectations for the respective reporting units. The projected future cash flows are discounted using
cost of capital metrics for Regions’ peer group or a build-up approach (such as the capital asset pricing model)
applicable to each reporting unit. The significant inputs to the income approach include expected future cash
flows, which are primarily driven by the long-term target tangible equity to tangible assets ratio, and the discount
rate, which is determined in the build-up approach using the risk-free rate of return, adjusted equity beta, equity
risk premium, and a company-specific risk factor. The company-specific risk factor is used to address the
uncertainty of growth estimates and earnings projections of management.
Regions uses the public company method and the transaction method as the two market approaches. The
public company method applies a value multiplier derived from each reporting unit’s peer group to a financial
metric of the reporting unit (e.g. last twelve months of earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation, tangible
book value, etc.) and an implied control premium to the respective reporting unit. The control premium is
evaluated and compared to similar financial services transactions. The transaction method applies a value
multiplier to a financial metric of the reporting unit based on comparable observed purchase transactions in the
financial services industry for the reporting unit (where available).
For purposes of performing Step Two of the goodwill impairment test, if applicable, Regions compares the
implied estimated fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. In order to
determine the implied estimated fair value, a full purchase price allocation would be performed in the same
manner as if a business combination had occurred. As part of the Step Two analysis, Regions estimates the fair
126